Bye-bye Bossa Nova Podcast
         For the past few years
        Ive had a musical soft spot for all things bossa nova. I trace my growing interest
        in this Brazilian music directly back to the 2001 release Casa, by Morelenbaum2/Sakamoto,
        a highly lauded album featuring compositions by Antonio Carlos Jobim performed in
        minimalist form. My enjoyment of Casa spurred me on to listen to more Jobim, which
        led to discovering more Brazilian music, both contemporary (Cibelle, Celso Fonseca) and
        classic (Joćo Gilberto, Elis Regina). The only problem I had was that, after a while, it
        got harder to find new music. Usually I find satellite radio a decent way to find new
        music, but while there may be 60-odd channels of satellite-radio music, not one regularly
        featured bossa nova. 
        One day I was looking on iTunes for new podcasts to listen
        to and, not expecting much, entered "bossa nova" in the search engine. I came
        across a podcast originating from www.bossanova.fm
        and hosted by Claudio, a native of Chile who now lives in Madrid. I downloaded his
        podcasts and put them on my iPod. During my next gym workout, I was delighted to find that
        they consisted of Claudio introducing bossa nova songs and artists and playing their work.
        The podcasts were delivered at 96kbps, which made them just fine for the gym and gave me
        ideas for my next visit to the record store (though later, on my home stereo, the lack of
        fidelity was evident). Finally, I had found a place where I could find artists Id
        overlooked, or hear unfamiliar tracks from familiar artists. When I got home, I checked
        out Claudios website to discover a wealth of information, including videos of Jobim,
        Bebel Gilberto, and Elis Regina. I subscribed to his podcast and bookmarked the site. 
        In mid-March, Claudio received an e-mail alerting him that,
        by using copyrighted material in his podcasts, he was in violation of the Digital
        Millennium Copyright Act. In response, he removed from his site all ten of the podcasts he
        had produced by that point. For two reasons, this saddened me. 
        First, it was clear from listening to the podcasts and
        reading his website that Claudio wanted to introduce people to this music. He wasnt
        making money from the podcasts, so he was essentially advertising these records for the
        record companies for free. He had introduced me to several artists whose albums Ive
        since purchased or wrote down on my "to buy" list. Without Claudios
        podcasts, Im back to looking for new artists the hard way, and my "to buy"
        list will likely grow at a much slower pace. By encouraging blind enforcement of copyright
        protection, record companies lose some of the best free advertising they could have. 
        Second, not only were Claudios podcasts acting as
        advertising, they were educational. By highlighting old and new bossa nova, Claudio
        provided lessons in musical history. True, his commentary was minimal, but the astute
        listener could gain from his podcasts an appreciation of the history of Brazilian popular
        music. Perhaps if hed provided more commentary and discussed each songs
        significance, Claudios podcasts would have met the criteria of fair use, which would
        have allowed him to use copyrighted material. 
        It is reasonable for the owners of intellectual property to
        want to control the economic benefits generated by that property. It is less reasonable to
        want to control all uses of that property, particularly uses that are not
        detrimental to the economic benefit realizable by the owner. Claudio produced podcasts
        that educated people about Brazilian music and acted as advertisements for artists and
        albums that receive little attention from the mainstream media. The podcasts were recorded
        at bit rate low enough that they did not compete with the quality of the official
        releases. Perhaps, instead of receiving cease-and-desist orders, Claudio should have been
        sent a letter of thanks for promoting these artists and their recordings. 
        Although you can no longer enjoy Claudios podcasts,
        Aperion Audios Intimus 632-LR bookshelf speakers and Intimus S-10 subwoofer can
        provide hours of musical enjoyment. However, you wont find them at your local store
        -- Aperion speakers are available only directly through their website. The company offers
        an in-home trial period, but direct marketing means that reviews are also valuable to
        potential customers. As this months review shows, I enjoyed my time with the Aperion
        speakers and think theyre worth your attention. 
        
Eric D. Hetherington 
         
        
        
         |